<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>geopolitics on Renewability.net</title>
    <link>https://renewability.net/tags/geopolitics/</link>
    <description>Recent content in geopolitics on Renewability.net</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://renewability.net/tags/geopolitics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Hormuz Closure and the Real Acceleration of Energy Alternatives</title>
      <link>https://renewability.net/2026/03/28/hormuz-closure-energy-alternatives/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://renewability.net/2026/03/28/hormuz-closure-energy-alternatives/</guid>
      <description>A closure of the Strait of Hormuz doesn’t trigger a clean transition to alternative energy systems. It triggers stress, repricing, and rapid prioritization. One of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints suddenly going offline means immediate supply shock, not gradual transformation. Oil flows tighten, freight costs spike, insurance premiums surge, and governments reach first for tools that can respond within months, not decades. That distinction matters more than any headline about “the end of oil.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
